VALERIE JARRETT OBAMA'S SOCIALIST SIDEKICK SAYS PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT IS TO GIVE PEOPLE LIVELYHOOD...MARXIST OR SOCIALIST?

There seems to be a fundamental disconnect between the Obama administration’s view of government and the founders view of government, not to mention the majority of Americans today. Obama’s senior adviser Valerie Jarrett declared the other day that the purpose of government is to “give people a livelihood so they can provide for their families.”

For a socialist or a communist, this is a proper view of government. But for the founders and for the majority of Americans this is a major over step of governmental power.

Jarrett is in the least a socialist. To her it’s the duty of the government to provide a job for every American. If she’s a Marxist, the government controls all industry and therefore can provide all jobs. If she’s a fascist then the government orders business to hire employees.

This is a substantial shift from the founders vision of government, which was limited to protecting individual rights. Jobs and income were never part of the founders discussions in the Federalist Papers. The Constitution doesn’t outline what the government will give the American people, rather it outlines the limited powers the government has. All other powers are reserved for the states or the people.

Most Americans still at least partially subscribe to the founders original vision of government. Part of the problem today is that even those of us on the right talk about job creation as though government create jobs.

It’s very easy to point out that 17-18 million jobs were created during the Reagan administration. President Reagan didn’t create those jobs though. All he did was cut government regulations and taxes. The result of doing those things spurred the private sector to create jobs.

Obama is running around the country with a jobs bill that doesn’t actually create private sector jobs. It’s the top down approach that we’ve come to expect from the far left. The job creator isn’t the private sector but rather the government. Not only does the government do an inefficient job (It will cost a minimum $200,000 per new job) but they also aren’t creating long term, stable jobs.

There’s a reason why the top down approach didn’t work for Obama’s Stimulus bill. Government created a miniscule amount of jobs and ended up losing more by creating massive regulations.

The Valerie Jarrett and Obama approach to jobs simply isn’t sustainable in a mostly free market economy. One is left wondering why they continue to push forward with the government control model that clearly doesn’t work.

It is necessary to go back to Obama’s victory speech in 2008 when he declared that now he was going to go forward and “fundamentally transform America.” Jarrett’s comments are that fundamental transformation of America that Obama was talking about. He wants America to become a socialist nation. His background and everything about his life leading up to becoming President has been about socialism and furthering the radical socialist cause.

While the progressive left grouses about Obama, he continues forward with his socialist vision for the country. His ridiculous jobs plan is little more than class warfare. Sure he’s trying to shore up his base but he really believes that the rich should give up most of their wealth. Behind the scenes, Obama continues to push forward with cumbersome regulations on business.

The far left was outraged by the debt ceiling deal but in the end Obama cut nothing the far left really cares about. From the looks of it there will be more military spending cuts than anything else, the progressive left ought to love that.

Obama still has the same vision for our nation that he did in 2008. He remains a committed socialist and continues to surround himself with committed socialists like Valerie Jarrett. His advisers remain far left liberals, he has no moderates in his administration.

Only two things have changed for Obama since he took office. First, now that the public knows him better it’s clear he never had the skills necessary to be President. Second, the public has given him a Republican House so as to obstruct his mission. Obama remains forever the same. The disconnect between his view of government and the founders is clear for everyone to see.

Thanks to Glenn Beck, the nation is beginning to see how high up the Obama administration’s chain-of-command radicalism is embedded. The problem doesn’t originate with Van Jones or some low-level staffer with ties to ACORN, but where the buck stops: the president, his wife, and their closest mutual friend and adviser Valerie Jarrett. On his radio show Tuesday, Beck interviewed Scott Baker, now of Breitbart TV, a self-described “news junkie” who clearly did his research on Jarrett.

Jarrett’s relationship with the Obamas, incoming administration radicals, and a socialist revolutionary who says she “probably” rejects violence (and allegedly offered Rod Blagojevich access to Obama’s fundraisers if he appointed Jarrett to Obama’s senate seat) filled up 4,000 words in my article for Monday’s FrontPage Magazine. Jarrett is, by all accounts, the closest friend and adviser to the first family. Obama says he doesn’t make a decision without her, and Jarrett described her relationship with the president by saying, “We have kind of a mind meld.” That’s scary, since she recruited Van Jones, Regulation Czar Cass Sunstein, and FCC Chief Diversity Officer Mark Lloyd. Administration staff said without her intervention, white advisers may have rejected “the often-legitimate concerns voiced by black leaders like [Al] Sharpton.” It’s more disturbing yet to explore the claustrophobic social circle of extremists she is facilitating into the White House.

Michelle Obama owes her career at Chicago’s city hall to Valerie Jarrett. In turn, Jarrett owes her secular career in real estate (at a firm called Habitat) to Marilyn Katz, an SDS radical who showed Days of Rage protesters how to fuse nails together to throw at oncoming police officers in 1968 Chicago. She is now a high-powered PR exec for Chi-town government agencies, a 40-year associate of former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, and according to Michelle Obama’s biographer, a vibrant part of the Obamas’ social circle. She spent the next 20 years fighting for a socialist “revolution” and promoting groups like the ACLU, Mother Jones, and UAW Local 719.

But Katz’s anti-American extremism was decades ago, when Barack Obama was seven, right? Asked six years ago if she had evolved since ’68, she said while she, like Ayers, regrets “nothing,” she “would probably reject violence as a useful form of revolution.” Probably?

In 2004, Katz endorsed John Kerry but acknowledged his imperfection, writing, “The day after Bush’s defeat, the U.S. will still be an imperialist power.” Like all radicals, her all-consuming focus is transforming the nation into a socialist haven, adapting her techniques as the situation requires.

She thought Obama (for whom she raised tens of thousands of dollars) and Jarrett were the best instruments for this purpose. Rod Blagojevich writes in his new book that Katz contacted him after Obama’s election and “indicated that if I appointed Valerie Jarrett to the U.S. Senate, the Obama people would help me raise money from their network of contributors across the country.” Jarrett declined to pursue the seat, but repaid Katz by inviting her patron to attend the Obama administration’s 37th anniversary of Title IX in July.

Baker picked up a few extra strands in the radio interview:

In fact, when you look even at Van Jones, one of the things that we looked at that Pam Key over at Naked Emperor News turned up was that Van Jones spoke in 1998 at a conference in Chicago, was the first Black Radical Congress [at which] Jeremiah Wright was also a speaker.

Though the Van Jones-Rev. Wright tie was perhaps a one-time affair, they share a common ideology.

The far greater threat is a stealth adviser who establishes the Obamas’s “whole notion of authenticity” by circumscribing their social reference to a world where Marilyn Katz, Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, and Louis Farrakhan dictate the limits of acceptable debate. Understanding Jarrett’s influence over Obama is key to understanding him and the quasi- or overtly socialist advisers he’s hoisting upon our country.

1. Baker is a former longtime anchor of Pittsburgh’s WTAE-TV, as well as a teacher of the Leadership Institute‘s Broadcast Journalism School, a Wheaton College grad, and a high school winner of the VFW Voice of Democracy Speech Contest.

2.Lloyd also got an assist from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, George Soros‘s Open Society Institute, and John Podesta‘s Center for American Progress., the large and well-financed leftist network Lloyd served in various capacities.
COMMENTS:

Buffoon
Unfortunately, the everyday serf is too stupid to understand they are AGAIN becoming slaves and the ones pulling the strings, well, they know full well what they're doing...

Its gonna get ugly folks...
AlaskanInfidel
Yer right. Ugly...
I've never seen the country so divided...by one who was to unite us. I knew that was a lie from the get go.
Wright said it all. Obama didn't have to.
When I see a guy hangin' out with say...bikers. I figure he has something in common with them. Same same Obama. He hangs with people that hate me for being a Capitalist Pig...
It's time our government once again feared the people rather than show open disdain and hatred for them.

Obama is a liar and Truth is
killing his Marxist agenda.

fiftyfifty
Valerie Jarrett is the carrier of the dirt to and from the underground

Ben Johnson
We have to say, whatever bad instincts she reinforces in Barack and Michelle Obama, they are the Obamas' instincts.....

MMM
Valerie Jarrett is a slum lord. The voice on this video is hard to take, but the info on Jarrett is revealing.

http://video.google.com/videosearch?client=safari&rls=en&q=obama%20role%20housing%20crisis&oe=UTF-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wv#

Nan J Warren's

Nan J Warren
I believe that all these commies in our country were taken off guard when the USSR collapsed. They were continuing to lay their commie ground work when it happened. Then they got the lying commie Clintons in place.

Now that Russia was going free market, helping to establish freedom of religion, and working to free itself from communism, the Clinton's continued the expansion of NATO, introduction of AMerican bases near the Russian borders and putting political and economic pressures on the newly non-communist Russia. See Russia was now the enemy of the commies not their leader anymore. That is why commie George Soros tried to undermine the ruble.

I know many older Russian people, refugees from the Communist USSR, at my church and all of them tell me that the USA right now is looking like the beginning of the USSR, after the Revolution, when the Reds made their biggest moves on ALL private property, professional people like doctors and business.

My older Serbian friends say the USA under Obama is beginning to look like Yugoslavia right after Tito took over. SOCIALIZE everything!! Top to bottom. QUICK, QUICK!!

Is this scary, YOU BET!!

The Commie technique of getting control of food supplies and starving the opposition, is NEXT!! You have all heard of food nazis... well they are really FOOD COMMIES!!
carterthewriter
The subversion began in Congress, unabated. Look at all Crooks in suits gladhanding one another as they have gotten their man in the White house.

With their propoganda media in place, next branch to conquer, the Supreme Court.

Oooops...forgot about Fox News and the internet.

Never before, has there been an outright attack against a network that has had the guts to report honestly about all the corruption taking place. If they weren't guilty, Fox would not be under fire.

The reaction speaks for itself.

It wouldn't surpRise me one bit if Barney Frank doesn't write a bill outlawing dissent.
Gringo Clowns
"Che Guevara is an inspiration for every human being who loves freedom, we will always honor his memory." --- NELSON MANDELA

We are counting down the days....to November 2012!