Showing posts with label FANNIE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FANNIE. Show all posts

DODD IS A DUD AGAIN-FAILED SENATOR RESPONSIBLE FOR COLLAPSING THE MORTGAGE MARKET NOW PROPOSES COUNTLESS NEW BUREAUCRACIES TO POLICE THE MARKETS




Banks and securities firms were collapsing, the mortgage market disintegrating, Wall Street itself was on the rocks, people were losing their life savings, homes and cars, while their credit lines were being cut off for no particularly good reason.

While this was going on, dozens of "senior" SEC staffers were surfing a variety of porn sites as much as 8 hours a day! This excluded the surfing time on taxpayer time and dollars of Elliot Spitzer, Bill Clinton and Barney Frank.

Now, that aging and thankfully retiring genius, who was responsible for the mortgage collapse, Senator Chris Dodd, who also forgot he got a sweetheart mortgage deal from a failed mortgage provider, has been looking to force on the market another Federal monstrosity with no less than 12-14 new departments and bureaucracies to over see the financial markets and firms!

It was Dodd, and his look alike, Barney Frank ( the voice of Yosemite Sam in the cartoons), who fought every attempt to stop the failed policies of FANNY and FREDDIE who they defended their reckless policies and paid millions to their appointed Democrat leaders.

We already have so many overlapping government policing bodies for the securities industry, that I bet Mr. Dodd could not even name several, and he is the chairman of a Senate committee overseeing all types of financial markets. Thankfully he is being chased out of the Senate before the ray of light is shined on his illustrious career of greed, self dealing and ineptness.

This guy has done more to decrease the value of our homes, screwed up our lending industry and all the while enriching himself.

Now he wants to reform the industry...him reforming the industry? LOL.

Dodd is a dud, finally he is leaving. This guy never had a real job in his life and has lived off the public dole his entire life...thank you for finally quitting and don't let the door hit you on the way out....one down and 59 to go!

Senate Democratic leaders set Monday for a key vote on financial regulatory reform legislation, setting off frantic negotiations to complete a bipartisan deal, while President Obama, speaking in New York, urged Wall Street "to join us, instead of fighting us." Right, join us id further destroying the free markets, free enterprise and add countess needless incompetents federal porn surfers.

The effort to reach a compromise on the landmark bill is expected to stretch through the weekend. Negotiations are focused on easing some of the bill's tough proposals on consumer protection, a fund to handle future financial crises and controls on the complex financial derivatives markets.

It is doubtful that any of the writers of this bill even know what a derivative is!

"We cannot turn into a petulant organization that screams at each other," said Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.). Oh really Senator, what really should be done is your mom needs to put you over her knee and spank you till you can finally see the light.

"We are now confronted with another great challenge — whether or not we can address the kinds of issues that will avoid the next financial crisis," Dodd said. Yes the crisis caused by YOU!

"We're continuing to negotiate in good faith, trying to reach a common goal," said Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.), who has been working with Dodd to craft a compromise. "I hope it's a bipartisan bill that we can gather a lot of people on both sides of the aisle.… But what is the main goal? To do it right."

Senator, you need to take your meds, so that you know what you are talking about.

The groundwork for the Senate's first vote on the issue was laid Thursday when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) Who voted against his own Health care bill since he appears to have dementia, asked to bring the legislation up for debate. As expected, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) objected, delaying action and giving negotiators more time to reach a compromise. Even if no deal is reached, Reid could win over at least one Republican ( dazed or fooled, confused) to circumvent McConnell's objection with a 60-vote majority in Monday's vote to begin formal debate.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), another genius, said he found it hard to believe that Republicans would "all vote no, blocking financial reform." They would not vote no if this was really reform.

"My guess is they won't," he said. But so far, no Republican has publicly announced support for the bill.

The landmark legislation would tighten financial regulations dramatically, alter free markets and create countless new federally mandated porn surfers, with great pension programs at taxpayer's expense.. It would create an agency to protect consumers in the financial marketplace; impose tough regulations on complex financial derivatives; grant shareholders a nonbinding vote on executive compensation ( wee need to vote on the salaries of the senators as well; and give the government authority to seize ( for any reason, and dismantle large firms whose failure would pose a danger to the economy or to their political agenda, to try to avoid future bailouts.

The financial industry, business groups and many Senate Republicans oppose several provisions, including a requirement that large banks such as Goldman and Bank of America spin off their derivatives-trading operations into subsidiaries. Industry executives argued that this could drive lucrative derivatives business overseas.

Democrats and Republicans also were haggling over how much power states would have to enforce national rules that the new consumer agency would write on financial products.

Another focus of dispute, however, appeared close to being solved. Many Republicans strongly oppose a proposed $50-billion fund to cover the costs if the government has to seize and dismantle a large financial firm on the brink of bankruptcy.

McConnell said having such a fund in place would allow it to be used for future bailouts. Dodd and Obama administration officials have said they are not wedded to the prepaid fund. They prefer that all taxpayers instead fund all the costs.

IDIOT SPEAKING AGAIN: IT MUST BE BARNEY FRANK GIVING HIS OPINION ABOUT STBILITY OF THE FREDDIE AND FANNIE BUSINESSES!




U.S. Taxpayers on the Hook for $5 Trillion of Fannie, Freddie Debt … No Matter What Barney Frank Says

Let's get realistic. Mr. Frank is an idiot, and I apologize to idiots everywhere for putting him in there with them-he deserves his own category, perhaps "super moronic idiot" as a suggestion, with his photo attached and a Webster's listing.

This man is responsible for the chaos in the nation's housing market, and he continues to make statements that do not deserve any publicity.

House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank caused a bit of an uproar Friday when he suggested the U.S. government does not guarantee the debts of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Rep. Frank later recanted and backed a Treasury Department statement reassuring investors that, yes, Fannie and Freddie Mae debt is guaranteed by the U.S. government. "Going forward," he said in a statement, we "will make sure that there are no implicit guarantees, hints, suggestions, or winks and nods...we will be explicit about what is and is not an obligation of the federal government."

But after years of winks and nods, there's no doubt that Fannie and Freddie now enjoy an explicit guarantee, according to most observers. The U.S. government placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in conservatorship in September 2008: "This means that the U.S. Taxpayer now stands behind $5 trillion of GSE debt," according to the Congressional Research Service.

The problem is that $5 trillion of so-called agency paper is not treated as if it is a debt of Uncle Sam for accounting purposes, says Richard Suttmeier, chief market strategist at Niagara International Capital and ValueEngine.com.

"Get it on the balance sheet - that's where it belongs," Suttmeier says. "Add it to the $14.2 trillion in [federal] debt and let's move on."

Another Time Bomb Ticking But $5 trillion is a lot of money - even by government standards -- and moving on may be the problem because of ongoing problems in the housing market, Suttmeier says. "There's a general concern on Main Street U.S.A. that ‘my neighbors are throwing in their keys, there's more for sale signs in my community...do I want to buy a new home, risking there's still downside risk to housing?' "

Noting the Case-Shiller 20-City Home Price Index is still 50% above 1999 levels and mortgage delinquencies are still rising despite the rebound in GDP, Suttmeier says "victory is nowhere in sight, particularly when the drain we're going to see from Fannie and Freddie is unlimited losses between now and the end of 2012 -- on top of the $400 billion that's already been allocated."

Coincidentally (or not), the FDIC is allowing U.S. banks until 2012 before forcing them to fully write-down bad or toxic loans, which is "another time bomb ticking," Suttmeier says. "They're hoping the public market comes back into the mortgage arena, which is going to be hard to do."

Unlimited losses from Fannie and Freddie? Keeping zombie banks alive on the backs of the taxpayer? Suttmeier's right: There's no accounting for that.

Please stop voting for this moron to be in Congress!

ANOTHER GOVERNMENT RUN DISASTER: FANNIE AND FREDDIE SUCK UP TAXPAYER FUNDS IN THE BILLIONS ON AN "UNLIMITED" LINE OF CREDIT



No business could ever survive, much less pay its executives the $110 million that Clinton cronies got paid for collapsing the two mortgage giants, except the two government run giants...products of the usual government incompetence!

Fannie Mae, the mortgage-finance company under federal conservatorship, said it will seek $15.3 billion in aid from the U.S. Treasury after posting a 10th straight quarterly loss. Why can't we all qualify to receive this never ending government handout?

A fourth-quarter net loss of $16.3 billion, or $2.87 a share, pushed the company to request its fifth draw on an unlimited lifeline from the government, Washington-based Fannie Mae said in a filing today with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Fannie Mae, which posted $120.5 billion in losses over the previous nine quarters, has taken $59.9 billion in federal aid since April. Its shares, which peaked at $87.81 in December 2000, closed at 99 cents today in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The Treasury owns 79.9 percent of Fannie Mae’s outstanding common shares.

Washington-based Fannie Mae, which owns or guarantees about 28 percent of the $11.8 trillion U.S. home-loan market, has been hobbled by a three-year housing slump that wiped 28 percent from home values nationwide and led to record foreclosures. Fannie Mae lost $74.4 billion for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, compared with $59.8 billion in 2008.

“Our financial results for 2009 reflected the continued adverse impact of the weak economy and housing market, which has resulted in record mortgage delinquencies and contributed to our recording significant credit-related expenses and net losses during each quarter of the year,” Fannie Mae said in the filing today.

Fannie Mae’s borrowings from Treasury will total $76.2 billion after the next payout, carrying with it an annual dividend cost of $7.6 billion, which the company said it will repay by borrowing more money from the Treasury. “This amount exceeds our reported annual net income for all but one of the last eight years, in most cases by a significant margin,” the company said.

The company said the ability to tap continuing cash infusions from the Treasury this year “is critical to keeping us solvent and avoiding the appointment of a receiver.”

The loss in the fourth quarter was driven in part by a $5 billion writedown on low-income housing tax credits that the Treasury Department barred the company from selling. Rival Freddie Mac took a $3.4 billion charge for the same reason.

These two losers are competing on who will achieve the larger loss, as their management honchos get paid millions and actually get "bonus" payments for their performance!

Losses at Fannie Mae are likely to grow with rising unemployment and costs to implement President Barack Obama’s plans to reduce foreclosures, the company said.

Let me understand this...Obama's plan to reduce foreclosures will grow the losses, what type of lunacy is this plan????

Fannie Mae and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac survived last year on investments the government made in the companies after regulators put them in conservatorship in September 2008. The Treasury on Christmas Eve removed a $200 billion limit on each company, extending unlimited backing through 2012.

The two companies own or guarantee more than $5 trillion in U.S. residential debt, and were responsible for as much as 75 percent of the new mortgages made last year.

This is happening because with the artificially low interest rates, nobody in his right mind would want to own 30 year mortgages that pay 4%-5%...DUH! This is NOT a reasonable market rate for mortgages with such high risk. If mortgage rates were not artificially held down by government fiat, these organizations would not have to guarantee them, as market forces would be at work.

For instance, when I last refinanced my mortgage, I opted for the then available no doc, no income mortgage loan, and with that I was prepared to pay and paid a higher rate for the privilege of obtaining a loan with minimum documentation. This did not render my mortgage loan any less value, but instead provided the owner of that note, a higher rate of interest inherent with the lesser documentation, and allowed me to choose that option for that privilege.

A record 3 million U.S. homes will be repossessed by lenders this year as unemployment and depressed home values leave borrowers unable to sell or make their house payments, according to a RealtyTrac Inc. forecast last month. Last year there were 2.82 million foreclosures, the most since the Irvine, California-based company began compiling data in 2005.

Fannie Mae and smaller rival Freddie Mac were chartered by the government primarily to lower the cost of homeownership by buying mortgages from lenders, freeing up cash at banks to make more loans. The companies make money by financing mortgage-asset purchases with lower-cost debt and by charging fees to guarantee securities they create out of home loans from lenders.

Fannie Mae’s net worth, or the difference between assets and liabilities, was negative $15.3 billion as of Dec. 31, compared with negative $15 billion on Sept. 30 and negative $10.6 billion on June 30, according to company statements.

For the fourth quarter, Fannie Mae decreased reserves for future credit losses to $64.9 billion last quarter from $65.9 billion in the previous quarter.

The amount of nonperforming loans that Fannie Mae guarantees for other investors rose to $174.6 billion from $163.9 billion in the third quarter, according to the filing. Fannie Mae also owned $41.9 billion in non-performing loans as of Dec. 31, up from $34.2 billion in the third quarter.

The fair value of Fannie Mae’s assets was negative $98.8 billion last quarter, compared with negative $90.4 billion at the end of September.

The Obama administration will wait until next year to seek legislation that addresses the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told the House Budget Committee on Feb. 24.

“We are going to propose reforms to the Congress next year to try to make sure we bring about fundamental change in the housing market and get ourselves in a position where the government is playing a less risky, but more constructive role in supporting housing markets,” Geithner said. “That’s going to be a difficult set of reforms.”

The Treasury and the companies’ regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, blocked Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae from selling their low-income housing tax credits, which can only be recognized if the companies expect to be profitable.

The Treasury found that an agreement Fannie Mae had to sell about half of its credits would have cost taxpayers more than the company would gain from the deal, according to a November letter to that company.

Why do we need these corporations to continue to lose our money? If we simply let market forces operate the markets would provide for a "market based" mortgage trading system which would provide real world market pricing, we as taxpayers would not suffer ANY losses...investors who want to take the risk would take the risk and any losses...they take that market risk based on the fees/interest they receive.

Does market based mortgage trading make more sense than constantly having to make good on bad borrowers mistakes?

HERE WE GO AGAIN, BARNEY FRANK WANTS TO RELAX LENDING RULES FOR FANNIE AND FREDDIE!



Two U.S. Democratic lawmakers want Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to relax recently tightened standards for mortgages on new condominiums, saying they could threaten the viability of some developments and slow the housing-market recovery, the Wall Street Journal said.

In March, Fannie Mae (FNM.N)(FNM.P) said it would no longer guarantee mortgages on condos in buildings where fewer than 70 percent of the units have been sold, up from 51 percent, the paper said. Freddie Mac (FRE.P)(FRE.N) is due to implement similar policies next month, the paper said.

In a letter to the CEO's of both companies, Representatives Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Anthony Weiner warned that a 70 percent sales threshold "may be too onerous" and could lead condo buyers to shun new developments, according to the paper.

The legislators asked the companies to "make appropriate adjustments" to their underwriting standards for condos, the paper added.

In an interview with the paper, Weiner said the rules have "had a real chill on the ability to get these condos sold," at a time when prices of condos have fallen enough to attract potential buyers.

In addition to the 70 percent sales threshold, Fannie Mae will also not purchase mortgages in buildings where 15 percent of owners are delinquent on condo association dues or where one owner has more than 10 percent of units, as the firm sees these as signals that a building could run into financial trouble, the paper added.

Both Fannie and Freddie are preparing a response to the lawmakers, according to the paper.

Barney started the road to disaster by insisting that lenders need to accommodate MORE deadbeats years ago, and is back to his old ways again.
 
|  FAILED GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS THAT DESTROY INCENTIVES AND WASTE MONEY. Blogger Template By Lawnydesignz Powered by Blogger