Showing posts with label Government mandated death traps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government mandated death traps. Show all posts

THE NEW 2012 CHEVY "DEATH TRAP"-A GOVERNMENT INSPIRED CAR THAT IS TOO SMALL AND TOO DANGEROUS PLANNED FOR INSTANT FAILURE



After revealing an eye-popping projected fuel economy figure for the Chevrolet Volt, General Motors took visiting journalists on a behind-the scenes tour of the carmaker's design studios for a look at its future product line-up.

There was just one rule: No photos could be taken. So the photos you see here are of upcoming products -- or ones just hitting showrooms now -- that have already been seen publicly.

The Volt is obviously the biggest news coming from Chevrolet, but an upcoming redesign of the popular Malibu will make plenty of news of its own. The current Malibu, named "Car of the Year" in 2008, has become an icon of GM's product turnaround.

Finally, here was a GM car with the performance, fuel economy and style to rival the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry.

The new Malibu will still be recognizable as the same car, but with sharper, more flowing lines. The back end of the car, in particular, is very different. The rear view on today's Malibu is bland, but the new version gets a BMW-like raised trunk lid with taillights that jut out at the corners.

"Our job is to make these vehicles look like $40,000 or $50,000 vehicles even though they're priced like Chevrolets," GM designer David Lyon said.

The trunk was designed to be bigger and easier to access in answer to customer complaints about the current car, a GM designer said. The car is almost imperceptibly larger, too, especially on the inside.

A Camaro convertible was also on display as proof that, yes, GM really is working on it.

A new Chevrolet Aveo small car was also on display right next to the sightly Spark subcompact. The new Aveo will look very much like a big brother to the Spark. Both, for instance, will have hidden rear door handles giving them a 2-door look.

In the next few years as we seek to collect back the "loans" to this company, it will be hard to imagine that PLUS SIZED Americans will be lining up to squeeze into these tiny death traps-cars that are likely not to protect their occupants in the event of a high speed crash...especially a crash with a large SUV or truck.

The government mandates to build small cars are absolutely going against the free market forces that dictate a need to comfortable larger cars...they can have smaller engines...but why would anyone in the car business think about that?

ELECTRIC CARS ARE SURELY TOPICS OF DISCUSSION BUT THEY HAVE TO BE CHARGED AND THEN THERE IS THE ISSUE OF SAFETY-NEW DEATH TRAPS?



Reva’s cheeky snub-nosed, two-door hatch­back, which seats two in the front and two in the rear, sells for Rs300,000 ($6,132, €4,383, £3,775) in India and £7,000 in Britain. It can run at 8,000 revolutions per minute. This translates into surprisingly quick acceleration – as fast as a conventional car.

The Reva is simple to drive, with no clutch or gears. Maintenance is low – the car has only 1,000 parts, a fifth the number of a conventional vehicle.

After 2½ hours plugged into an ordinary socket, Reva’s eight, six-volt EV lead acid batteries will be 80 per cent charged, although a full charge takes nine to 10 hours. This will power the car for a distance of 80km.

this range is not enough to make the Reva a contender overseas for a family’s main car.

But just reaching this point has been an exhausting journey. After finishing at Stanford in 1993, Mr Maini teamed up a year later with Lon Bell, an inventor friend of his father’s who was involved in early work on the airbag.

The company spent the next seven years researching electric cars and produced 10 patents. Particularly important was its development of the “brain”, or energy management system, of the Reva. The brain regulates the flow of power from the batteries to the motor and other systems. When the charge in the battery falls below a certain level, the car automatically switches to “preserve power” mode to ensure the driver has plenty of warning and does not become stranded.

In 2001, the joint venture released its first battery-powered cars in India and the UK, where they are called the G-wiz. In 2006, Draper Harper Jurvetson, a Silicon Valley early-stage venture capital firm, became a partner. The group has also attracted funding from the Global Environment Fund. Total investment to date from all parties has been $50m-$60m.

To reduce overheads and cut down on management time, Mr Maini has kept the technology behind the Reva in-house while farming out manufacturing of components to contractors.

He says working in India comes with its own challenges. In spite of the country’s plethora of software engineers, it is harder to find experts with the skills to develop an automotive product from the ground up. But, he says, Indian engineers are more innovative in getting round day-to-day obstacles and more cost conscious. “We find ways to get to our objective,” Mr Maini says.

Now, with oil prices high and the world becoming determined to tackle climate change, Mr Maini believes the time has come for his product.

The company has sold only about 3,000 vehicles to date, but he expects sales of up to 2,000 this year, half of them in India and the rest in at least 20 overseas markets, which include Norway, Spain and the Philippines. This would be three to four times the volume of last year, and Mr Maini predicts growth will be of this order for the next few years. “We’ve gone through the slow, testing phase. Now it’s time to take off,” he says.

Chetan MainiThe election of a more environmentally conscious government in the US has reopened North America as a possible market. In Europe, governments are offering incentives to buy electric cars.

In India, however, government policy on electric cars remains muddled. New Delhi has raised and lowered taxes on electric cars in an ad hoc way and there is no co-ordination between the states.

Mr Maini maintains that India needs to take a more entrepreneurial view in its industrial policies. Green technologies play to India’s skills in low-cost engineering, he says, and cleaner energy will be critical to the country’s goal of delivering higher living standards to its 1.1bn people.

Analysts remain sceptical of Reva’s chances of becoming a mass consumer item without help from large corporate rivals, and are particularly wary of a claim that, with the right policies, electric vehicles could account for 10 per cent of Indian passenger car sales by 2015.

For one thing, the Reva faces stiff competition in the petrol-driven mini-car segment from the recently released Tata Nano, the world’s cheapest car, which sells for as little as Rs100,000.

Vikas Sehgal, a Chicago-based partner at Booz & Co, an industry consultant, says: “By 2015, we are looking at India becoming a 2.7m-units-per-year car market. So to sell nearly 300,000 hybrid cars is not possible without Tata or Maruti [Suzuki] or Hyundai – together they have a 90 per cent market share – going the battery-operated way.”

“The world can no longer afford conventional cars,” Mr Maini says. “From an automotive point of view, if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.”

Is it just another politically correct hyped car that is not realistic for the population?

DEATH SENTENCE; GOVERNMENT MANDATED SMALL CARS KILL/INJURE OCCUPANTS THE MOST



(ABOVE IS THE SMALL CAR CRASH TEST DUMMY SHOWING SERIOUS INJURY IN CRASH, HONDA FIT AND TOYOTA YARIS WERE THE WORST IN TEST CRASHES)

Again our government is at it...telling us and the auto industry how to build cars and which ones to punish and which one's to reward.

First, it was the mandate to have airbags in cars.

Then it was proven that children would be killed or injured in the vehicles due to the force of the airbags deploying.

Then it was shown that the drivers who might be wearing glasses or contact lenses in crashed would be blinded by having the airbag push the glasses into they eyes.

Then, and worst of all the automobiles which had in addition to the front airbag, (as extra safety feature) the autos had side airbags or curtain airbags that opened up on the sides, caused such a build up of high pressure in the cars, that they exploded the ear drums or worse, of the occupants.

Thank you, big hand of government again, causing more injuries and adding expensive airbags that tend to kill and injure, not help.

Also, it appears that as the cars get older, the airbags that are in them may deploy at random, causing fatal crashes or injuries to not just the occupants, but to the drivers on the road around them as they crash from the sudden deployment and sudden shock.

Now, the worst statistics yet.

The small cars touted by the government as being fuel miserly, tend to be so small that they cause injury and death as "death traps" when involved in accidents, especially with larger vehicles such as SUV's, pick up trucks and full size automobiles.

So as you though you could save the eco system or something like that, you put yourself and your family instead into a death trap vehicle which now will clearly cost you, not just in added insurance but medical costs as well.

What will they mandate next? Smaller SUV's, smaller pick up trucks?

Remember that old quote, " I'm from the government, and I am here to help you." ????

Another government statement that is really a joke, in real life......
 
|  FAILED GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS THAT DESTROY INCENTIVES AND WASTE MONEY. Blogger Template By Lawnydesignz Powered by Blogger