Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

ILLINOIS DEMOCRATS ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE STATE'S ECONOMY, JOBS, AND FUTURE BY 75% TAX INCREASE: STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES!




The plans by Illinois' DEMOCRATIC politicians who have run this state right into the ground now will definitely provide for a deeper recession and worse financial crisis as actions they are taking will push all new business out of this state, will motivate present businesses to move elsewhere, and will suck out more funds from the wallets of working taxpayers.

Illinois has already started losing population, now this will worsen and home values will plummet as well as people move out and sell.

Top Illinois State Legislators, all Democrats, have agreed to push a plan that would temporarily boost income taxes by 75 percent and double cigarette taxes, Senate President John Cullerton said Thursday.

Why are we not setting up the flogging gallows for this spending and spending legislature?

This BLUE state is so broke we are the laughing stock of the entire world together with California, Ohio and New York! Notice each of these states is controlled by the runaway spending policies of their majority Democratic legislators.

If one was to forecast the future spending in these states, theoretically over the next century, at the present rates of entitlements and other spending increases, every resident would have to be taxed at 100% of their income ( every corporation and business too)!

ARE THESE PEOPLE CRAZY, DO ANY OF THEM OWN A checkbook to understand how it is supposed to work? No money in the checkbook, no spending!

Illinois’ personal income tax rate, now 3 percent, would climb to 5.25 percent for four years under the plan Cullerton outlined. After that, it would drop to 3.75 percent. OH, that is really something we can believe...it will never happen!

That means someone who now owes $1,000 in state income taxes would owe $1,750 at the new rate, then $1,250 after four years ( right!).

The permanent portion would be used several ways. Some would be devoted to schools ( yes just like the Lottery was supposed to do, but then other funds were deleted and the lottery was substituted, for a net effect of ZERO) and some to repaying an $8.5 billion loan ( and the rest to fraud and corruption we assume) that would be used to pay overdue bills, Cullerton said.

Do not forget that Illinois is well known for the fact that literally most of its Governors in the last few decades have gone right to prison after their term ended and at present we have one who was thrown out of office for attempting to sell Obama's Senate seat for personal gain, and is scheduled for trial.

Another chunk would go to property tax relief in the form of annual $325 checks, he said. The checks would replace the property tax exemption that homeowners can now claim on their income taxes. WOW A $325 CHECK to offset my $11,000 property tax bill, what a grand gesture!

Cullerton said House Speaker Michael Madigan and Gov. Pat Quinn fully support the tax proposal, although Quinn once promised to veto any increase of that size. These politicians are so entrenched in their offices that each of them profits handsomely from personal ownership in law firms that do a lot of business with large corporations seeking tax relief or other favors in the State.

Madigan’s spokesman said he couldn’t discuss the speaker’s position ( because he had no real defense perhaps?). The Senate has approved tax increases in the past, so the biggest question about this proposal is whether Madigan can find enough votes to get it through the House.

The governor’s office put out a statement that stopped short of saying the three leaders had reached a final agreement. Rank-and-file legislators said Quinn described the tax plan to them earlier in the day and portrayed it as a deal among all three of the powerful Democrats.

Democrats say they have no choice but to raise taxes as one part of a solution to Illinois’ massive budget crisis. The state deficit could reach $15 billion in the coming year. The government is borrowing money to cover some obligations, letting bills go unpaid for months and cutting corners everywhere from state prisons to state parks.

Yet, they did not cut enough, did they? In fact Illinois is actually INCREASING its spending instead of cutting back, not a dime of cutting back of the budget.

It is time to slash, slash by 25%-30% or more everything including the overly generous and out of control pensions for retiring workers that see 85% of their salaries paid!

“We are in desperate need,” Cullerton said at a news conference in his office.

Cullerton said the higher taxes would generate about $7.5 billion a year during the four years they’re at their highest.

The tax on cigarettes, now 98 cents a pack, would jump to $1.98, Cullerton said. The money would be earmarked for education.

Quinn, Cullerton and Madigan want to pass something before the current General Assembly formally ends Jan. 12. After that, they lose some of their Democratic majority as well as outgoing legislators who might be persuaded to support a tax increase as they leave office.

Madigan has repeatedly said he doubts that a tax increase could pass in the House without Republican support. But Republican leaders have not been included in tax and budget negotiations, and there was no indication Thursday that they were prepared to cooperate with the Democrats.

“If they think this is a solution, they should go ahead and put their own votes on it,” said Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno, R-Lemont.

Cullerton emphasized that taxes would be just one part of the solution.

Quinn and the Legislature already have cut spending significantly. They’ve also reduced pension benefits for future state employees and passed a plan to help limit the cost of providing health care to the poor.

Cullerton said there also will be a moratorium on new programs and spending growth would be held to 1 percent a year.

“We are not doing a short-term fix,” he said.

The tax proposal puts Quinn in an awkward position. It would boost the tax rate by 2.25 percentage points, but the governor promised last year to veto any increase above 1 percentage point.

Last summer, a Quinn aide suggested taxes might have to be raised by 2 points. Quinn quickly disavowed the comments and said he opposed anything beyond his proposed hike of 1 percentage point.

“I’m going to veto anything that isn’t my plan,” Quinn said at the time.

Quinn’s office didn’t comment Thursday on the conflict between the tax plan and his campaign promise.

Radogno said it would be “dishonest” for Quinn to approve it after promising a veto.

“To me, that’s kind of a bait and switch,” she said.

The Illinois residents have got to wise-up and throw out all these spend and spend liberals that are destroying the economic viability of the state and its residents.

What services is the State providing that we can not live without?

The local jurisdictions clean the snow, the state does not.

The driver license is self supporting from that department.

The schools and their overpaid staff is mostly supported by local property taxes.

Oh, yes now I remember, the state needs all those welcome to Illinois signs with the governor's name on them.

DO REPUBLICANS REPRESENT THE RICHEST CONSTITUENTS? WRONG, IT'S THE DEMOCRATS THAT DO..LATEST MIS-INFORMATION




In major flip, House Dems now represent richest regions of the USA.
Democratic members of the House of Representatives now represent most of the nation's wealthiest people, a sharp turnaround from the long-standing dominance that Republicans have held over affluent districts, and were generally considered as theirs.

A USA TODAY analysis of new Census data found that Democrats represent a far different constituency today than they did in 2005, when they were the minority in the House, or in 1990, when they were the majority.

The Democratic-controlled House is now an unusual combination of the richest and poorest districts, the best and least educated, and the best and the worst insured. The analysis found that Democrats have attracted educated, affluent whites who had tended previously to vote Republican.

Democrats now represent 57% of the 4.8 million households that had incomes of $200,000 or more in 2008. In 2005, Republicans represented 55% of those affluent households.

"Democrats have made enormous gains in affluent, educated suburban districts," says Warren Glimpse, founder of Proximity, a firm that analyzes demographics. "What's not clear is whether this reflects a profound change or a temporary blip."

The Democrats' new coalition of extremes could cause friction on issues such as health care and tax policy because of Democratic proposals to raise taxes on affluent households.

"We're going to win back the hearts and minds of affluent voters when people see what the left-leaning Democrats do on health care and the economy," says Connecticut Republican Party Chairman Chris Healy. His state's three most affluent districts have flipped from Republican control to Democrats since 2006.

Ruy Teixeira of the liberal Center for American Progress disagrees: "The movement of professionals to the Democratic Party is a long-term realignment in American politics."

"The story is really education," says David Wasserman of the non-partisan Cook Political Report.He says "educated, wine-drinking Democrats" and poorer minority voters are an effective coalition because both groups are increasing in numbers. Even so, Wasserman expects Democrats to lose up to two dozen seats in the 2010 congressional elections, especially in poorer, white districts.

Democrats have virtually erased the historic wealth gap that has long defined the parties and their policies. The median household income of Democratic districts last year was just $1,180 less than in Republican districts, down from $6,793 in 1990.

Wasserman says Republicans have tended to appeal to affluent voters since the Roosevelt era in the 1930s and 1940s but recently have appealed more to Southern and rural voters, who often have lower incomes.

Key demographic findings are also interesting:

• Education Democrats represent the top 10 and bottom 10 districts ranked by the percentage of people holding advanced degrees.

• Health insurance. Democrats represent the 10 districts with the highest levels of health coverage and nine of the 10 with the lowest.

A side note is that if one looks at how the district boundaries are set, it is possible to represent the richest and poorest at the same time is the gerrymandering that goes on to draw district maps to include a large contingent of poor, running the district along one street in a bid city out to the suburbs and then absorbing a wealthy suburb which is drowned out in votes by the innner city resident who may be 80% of the vote.

That's democracy for you!

Just study the map above of Illinois First congressional district, where a former Black Panther anarchist, represents a district that snakes itself into wealthy suburbs and absorbs their vote. Also the other map shows another district (IL 11) that snakes itself to create certain political election results.

The ability to re-draw the districts after a census like the one in 2010, would allow one party to literally kick out an opponent though the re-drawing of the district's boundaries.
 
|  FAILED GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS THAT DESTROY INCENTIVES AND WASTE MONEY. Blogger Template By Lawnydesignz Powered by Blogger